Performance Assessment Validation

Educator analyzes a performance assessment and rubric for qualities of validity.
Made by Center for Collaborative Education Inc.
APPLY

About this Micro-credential

Key Method

The educator analyzes a performance assessment and rubric for qualities of validity (alignment, fairness, clarity, engagement, and scoring criteria). This micro-credential will focus on 1) giving feedback based on task quality criteria and 2) receiving feedback and making revisions.

Method Components

The Basic Performance Assessment for Learning Design stack is designed so that, if all three credentials are taken together, they will become more than the sum of their parts. Each micro-credential is intended to be able to stand on its own; however, the ideas and activities of each of these credentials support and expand on the others, allowing a fuller appreciation of performance assessment and its implications.

Your Task:

Conduct a Validation Protocol meeting with at least two other educators.

  1. Provide feedback on another educator’s task.
    1. Conduct the Assessment Validation Protocol with the presenting educator and at least two other educators and complete the Assessment Validation Checklist, making thorough notes.
    2. Provide actionable feedback to the presenter(s), indicating where the task is strong (in terms of validity) and where changes might be made to strengthen it.
  2. Receive feedback on your own task.
    1. Conduct the Assessment Validation Protocol with at least three educators and have them complete the Assessment Validation Checklist about your assessment, making thorough notes.
    2. Receive actionable feedback from your colleague.
    3. Make revisions based on that feedback.

When we ask whether a task is valid, we are asking whether it actually measures the learning target we intend it to measure, as well as giving all students the opportunity to demonstrate achievement.

We ask the following: Is the PA tightly aligned to the learning target? Is the PA fair? Do all students have equal opportunity to demonstrate achievement of the learning target(s)? Is the PA engaging? Does it allow multiple modalities for learning and demonstrating achievement? Does it allow student voice and choice? These and other questions that raise issues around validity can be found in the Assessment Validation Checklist (see Resources).

Assuring the validity of PAs is a complicated and subtle process—far more complicated than looking at a list of traits and checking them off. As much as this micro-credential is about validity, it is about the process of assuring validity, which is necessarily a collaborative one.

The required protocol to use is the Assessment Validation Checklist and the Assessment Validation Protocol (see Resources).

Research & Resources

Supporting Research

Resources

Tools

Submission Requirements

Submission Guidelines & Evaluation Criteria

To earn the micro-credential, you must receive a passing evaluation for Parts 1 and 3 and a “Got it” for Part 2.

Part 1. Overview questions

(200-word limit for each response)

  • Describe the context within which this feedback is being given. What school? Grade level? Subject area? What is the history of your PLC and your history of giving and receiving feedback with that colleague?
  • Describe the experience of giving feedback to your peer(s) on validity. What did you notice? What was challenging?
  • Describe the experience of receiving feedback from your peer(s). What did you notice? What was challenging?Œæ How did you go about executing revisions?

Part 2. Evidence/artifacts

To earn the micro-credential for Performance Assessment Validation, the educator must submit the following:

For Giving Feedback:

  • A copy of your partner’s performance assessment (student instructions and rubric).
  • A copy of the completed Assessment Validation Checklist, with thorough notes.
  • A copy of any other feedback you provided your partner, either written or recorded.

For Receiving Feedback:

  • A copy of your performance assessment, with tracked edits showing the revisions made throughout the process.
  • A copy of the Assessment Validation Checklist, completed and with your reviewing team’s thorough notes.

Demonstrating the Process:

  • A video, audio, or transcript of you and your partner thoughtfully discussing the validation process. It could be either an open conversation or an interview of your colleague conducted by you.

Part 3. Reflection

Write a reflective essay (1,000-word limit) OR record a five- to ten-minute video or audio addressing the following topics (be sure to use specificsthat illustrate why you come to the conclusions you do):

  • In general, what did you notice about leading the validation process? What were some challenges for you?
  • Describe how your understanding of task design was improved by engaging in this validation process?
  • What is the importance to you of working with a team in this process? How was your team valuable to you, and vice versa? What were your team’s thoughts on the process?

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under:
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Requirements

Download to access the requirements and scoring guide for this micro-credential.
How to prepare for and earn this micro-credential - in a downloadable PDF document

Ready to get started?

APPLY